SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 859

P.S.NARAYANA
RAGHURAM KAMISETTY – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Court ordered Notice Before Admission on 20. 9. 2006. This Court also made the following order:

"in the meanwhile, there shall be stay of collection of penalty imposed under the proceedings of the respondent No. 1, dated 10. 7. 2006. Print the name of Mr. J. Ashok for respondents".

( 2 ) COUNTER affidavit is filed on behalf of the 1st respondent.

( 3 ) SRI K. V. Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel representing the petitioner had taken this Court through the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition and would maintain that in the facts and circumstances of the case the imposition of penalty on the ground of alleged suppression of information cannot be sustained. The learned counsel also had taken this Court through the relevant statutory provisions in the Passport Act, 1967.

( 4 ) PER contra, Sri J. Ashok, learned counsel representing the 1st respondent would maintain that in the facts and circumstances the order made is in accordance with law. The learned counsel strongly relied upon Section 12 (1) (b)of the Passport Act, 1967 in this regard.

( 5 ) HEARD the counsel.

( 6 ) THE Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top