V.V.S.RAO
Mohammed Abdul Rahman – Appellant
Versus
B. Manorama – Respondent
Both the civil revision petitions filed under Section 22 of Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1960 (the Act, for brevity) arise out of same original proceedings and therefore it is expedient to dispose of by common order. These civil revision petitions are filed by thirteen petitioners. Petitioners 1 to 5 are brothers, petitioner No.6 is wife and petitioners 7 to 13 are children of late Mohammed Abdul Rasheed (other brother of petitioners 1 to 5). All of them filed R.C. No.473 of 1998 before learned IV Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, for eviction of respondents from non-residential premises bearing Municipal No.5-2-1020. Grounds urged are wilful default in payment of rent from January 1998 to June 1998 and bona fide requirement of leased premises for personal occupation for commencement of business in 'tobacco khiwam' by petitioner No.9. Learned Rent Controller negatived allegation of WILFUL default but held that requirement of petitioner No.9 is genuine and bona fide, and accordingly ordered eviction of respondents. Aggrieved by the same, respondents herein filed rent appeal being R.A. No.l96 of 2002 whereas petitioners herein filed R.A. N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.