1. This Court ordered Notice Before Admission on 13.03.2008 and granted interim stay for a limited period, which is being extended from time to time. Sri Balagopal entered appearance on behalf of the respondents.

2. The respondents in the revision petition filed C.M.P.No.3057 of 2008 with a prayer to vacate the interim stay granted by this Court. At the stage of hearing of the application to vacate the interim stay, Sri Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel representing the revision petitioner and Sri Balagopal, representing the respondents made elaborate submissions and also made a further request to dispose of the revision petition itself finally. Hence, the revision petition is being disposed of finally by this Court with the consent of both the counsel.

3. Sri Rathangapani Reddy, the learned counsel representing the revision petitioner would maintain that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the decree made by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, (Fast Track Court) to be taken as a decree made on merits and the only remedy available to the respondents/defendants may be to prefer an appeal and the application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil