IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
G.S. SINGHVI, C.J. and C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.
Mohd. Moazam Khan and others – Appellant.
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (Elec.II) Department, Hyderabad and others – Respondent.
Writ Petition Nos.17524, 17525 and 18249 of 2005 - Decided on 31-1-2007.
b) Constitution of India - Articles 243-K(3) and 243-U(3):- Withholding the conduct of elections to 12 Municipalities and 8 Panchayaths adjacent to Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and appointing special officers for managing them, is not violative of the Article 243K(3) and Article 243U(3) in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 2003 SC 1659.
c) Constitution of India -Articles 371(D) (1), (2), (10), 243-Q:- Issue of G.O. constituting Greater Hyderabad adding the municipalities and panchayath areas to the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad as mentioned in AP. Public Employment Order 1975 without amending the Presidential order is not violative of Article 371D and 243-Q as it does not in any way reduce the local area as defined in the Presidential Order.
d) AP. Districts (Formation) Act 1974 Section 3:- Constituting Greater Hyderabad by adding some of the municipalities and panchayath in the Rangareddy District is not violative of Section 3 of District because the provisions of the Act for merely for governance of revenue administration.
e) A.P. Municipalities Act 1965 Sections 3-A and 62:- Constitution of Greater Hyderabad is not ultra virus of the provisions of the Section 3-A and 62 of A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965.
f) A.P. Panchayat Raj Act 1994. Section 250:- Constitution of Greater Hyderabad is not ultra virus of the provisions of A.P.Panchayath Act,1994
(Per G.S. Singhvi, C.J.)
Whether the proposed inclusion of L.B.Nagar, Gaddiannaram, Uppal Kalan, Kapra, Alwal, Qutubullapur, Malkajgiri, Kukatpally, Serilingampalli, Rajendernagar, Patancheru and Ramachandrapuram Municipalities and Shamshabad, Mamidipalli, Satamarai, Jalapally, Mankhal, Almasguda/Tukkuguda, Sardarnagar and Ravarala Gram Panchayats located around Hyderabad in the limits of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad for the purpose of constituting Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation is ultra vires the provisions of Articles 243E, 243P, 243Q, 243U, 243ZF and 371-D of the Constitution of India and violative of Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 is the common question of law, which arises for determination in these petitions filed for striking down Sections 3 and 679-D of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (for short, 'the 1955 Act') and notifications issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh vide G.O.Ms.Nos.703 and 704, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (Elec.II) Department, dated 20-7-2005. In Writ Petition No.17524 of 2005, the petitioners have also prayed for issue of a mandamus to the respondents to conduct elections to Rajender Nagar Municipality and in all suburban municipalities which are sought to be merged in Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. In Writ Petition No.17525 of 2005 (amended), the petitioner has further prayed for striking down Section 246(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (for short, 'the 1994 Act') and Sections 3-A and 62 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 (for short, 'the 1965 Act').
2. Three of the nine petitioners, who have filed Writ Petition No.17524 of 2005, are Members of Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, five are Corporators from different wards of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (for short, 'the Corporation') and one is ex-Vice-Chairman of Rajender Nagar Municipality. Writ Petition No.17525 of 2005 has been filed by Sri Asaduddin Owaisi, who has been a Member of the Legislative Assembly and is presently a Member of Parliament from Hyderabad Parliamentary Constituency and Writ Petition No.18249 of 2005 has been filed by Sri B.Subash Reddy, Chairman of Gaddiannaram Municipality, Ranga Reddy District.
3. For deciding the aforementioned question, it will be useful to briefly notice the background in which the impugned G.Os. have been issued.
4. The Hyderabad Municipality was first constituted in 1869 with an area of about 55 kms. At that time, the population of Hyderabad was 3.5 lakhs. In 1886, a separate Municipality known as "Chaderghat Municipality" was constituted for the new city area. In 1921, the area of Hyderabad Municipality was extended to about 84 kms. After 10 years, Secunderabad Town Improvement Trust was constituted. Simultaneously, Hyderabad and Chaderghat Municipalities were merged. In 1933, Hyderabad Municipal Act was enacted and the existing municipality was conferred the status of a municipal corporation. In 1937, a separate municipality was constituted with the name "Jubilee Hills Municipality" for the areas of Banjara Hills, Jubilee Hills etc. In 1945, Secunderabad Municipality was constituted. In 1947, the limits of Secunderabad Municipality was extended by including the adjoining areas. In 1948, the Jubilee Hills Municipality was merged with Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. In 1951, Secunderabad Municipality was upgraded and converted into Corporation. In 1960, the Secunderabad Municipal Corporation was merged with Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.
5. At present, Hyderabad is the largest city in the State of Andhra Pradesh in terms of the area and population. It has been recognized as a Metropolis and given the status of Mega-City by the Central Government. The expansion and growth of Hyderabad started in the year 1950. After formation of the State of Andhra Pradesh in 1956, Hyderabad was chosen as its capital. In last five decades, there has been rapid industrialization in public as w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.