SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 367

G. YETHIRAJULU, J.
Ramesh Jaichand Shah - Appellant
Versus
Swathi Drug Agencies (Pvt.) Limited, Hyderabad and another - Respondents
Crl. R.C. M.P.No.1075 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. No.134 of 2008
Decided on : 13-06-2008

Advocates appeared
Counsel for petitioners: Sri G. Narender Raj
Counsel for respondent: P. Krishna Prakash

Headnote:

Code of the Criminal Procedure – Section 357 – Negotiable Instruments Act – Section 138 – Payment of Compensation – M.P. has been filed by the complainant in C.C. filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Trial Court convicted the accused for the offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year and also payment of a fine in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for ten days – Accused was also directed to pay compensation under Section 357 (3) of the Code of the Criminal Procedure and further mentioned that the complainant is entitled for compensation amount after the appeal time – Accused being aggrieved by the judgment of the trial Court preferred Criminal Appeal and the appellate Court after considering the evidence and the judgment of the trial Court dismissed the appeal by confirming the conviction and the sentence imposed by the trial Court – Held, Power of the Court under Section 357 (3) of Cr.P.C. and held that the power under Section 357 (3) cannot be exercised to enhance a fine already imposed as part of the sentence and when the accused is sentenced to imprisonment and fine – Direction of the High Court for payment of Rs.1,00,000/- by the accused as compensation to the complainant cannot be imposed – Lower Court also granted compensation under Section 357 (3) of Cr.P.C. According to the decision of the Supreme Court referred above, it appears that the imposition of compensation in addition to sentence of imprisonment and fine is illegal, therefore, Court is not inclined to grant leave to the complainant for realization of the compensation amount from the properties of the accused – Crl. R.C. M.P. Dismissed

ORDER

1. This M.P. has been filed by the complainant in C.C. No.1350 of 2001 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial Court convicted the accused for the offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year and also payment of a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for ten days. The accused was also directed to pay compensation of Rs.2,50,096/- under Section 357 (3) of the Code of the Criminal Procedure and further mentioned that the complainant is entitled for compensation amount after the appeal time. The accused being aggrieved by the judgment of the trial Court preferred Criminal Appeal No.97 of 2006 and the appellate Court after considering the evidence and the judgment of the trial Court dismissed the appeal by confirming the conviction and the sentence imposed by the trial Court.

2. The accused being aggrieved by the judgment of the lower appellate Court, preferred the present revision case. During the pendency of the revision case, the complainant filed Criminal M.P. No.1075 of 2008 praying this Court to grant leave to the complainant to take appropriate steps available under law for realization of the compensation amount of Rs.2,50,096/- from the properties of the accused.

3. The revision petitioner opposed the application by contending that the order of compensation passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court is illegal, as it is not in accordance with provision 357 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, therefore, the complainant shall not be granted any leave for realization of the amount till the disposal of the revision case.

4. In the light of the above contentions, the point for consideration is Whether the complainant can be permitted to realize the amount as directed by the trial Court that the complainant can realize the amount after the disposal of the appeal.

Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads as follows:

"Section 357 : Order to pay compensation.- (1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied :-

(a) in defraying the expenses properly incurred in the prosecution;

(b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court;

(c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act (13 of 1855), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death;

(d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto.

(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal, no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal is presented, before the decision of the appeal.

(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top