1. This court issued Rule nisi on 17-06-2009.

2. Counter affidavits had been filed.

3. Though the matter is coming under the caption “Interlocutory”, at the request of the counsel on record the Writ Petition itself is being disposed of finally.

4. The writ petitioner, K. Ramachandra Rao, filed the present writ petition for a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the impugned action of the respondents, particularly the 1st respondent in passing orders in Revision Petition filed by the petitioner, through Memo No.29099/Pts.IV/A2/08-5, dt.22-05-2009, without assigning any reasons and thereby dismissing the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the impugned Memo No.29099/Pts.IV/A2/08-5, dt.22-05-2009 and pass such other suitable orders.

5. Ms.P.S. Bhramaramba Devi, learned counsel representing the petitioner had taken this court through the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and also the respective stands taken in the counter affidavits and would maintain that in the facts and circumsta