B.PRAKASH RAO, L.NARASIMHA REDDY, G.V.SEETHAPATHY
Superintendent of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Vishnupriya Industries Ltd. – Respondent
(Per L. Narasimha Reddy, J.)
In the event of a Company being woundup, in any of the three recognized modes, viz., by the Court, or voluntarily by a Company itself, or subject to the supervision of the Court, preparation of list of assets and liabilities becomes essential. The Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') recognizes certain priorities, in the matter of distribution of assets of a company, under winding-up. It is not uncommon that the assets of certain companies are burdened with liability of payment of tax of different kinds, excise duty, customs duty etc.
2. The question, as to whether the claim of a secured creditor has precedence over the right of the concerned government department, to recover dues of tax, the customs duty in particular, arises for consideration in this appeal.
3. M/s. Sri Vishnupriya Industries Limited, the 151 respondent herein, was incorporated under the Act, with an objective of undertaking manufacturing activity. It established a factory at Panyam in Kurnool District. To carryon its activity, it intended to import machinery and components, from foreign countries. Accordingly, it submitted an application to the Customs Department, to provid
Collector of Customs v. Dytron (India) Ltd.: 1999 ELT 108 p.342 (D.B.). (Para 6)
M.K. Ranganathan v. Government of Madras: AIR 1955 SC 604. (Para 16)
Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh and Co.: (2000) 5 SCC 694. (Para 31)
ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Sidco Leather Ltd.: 2006 (6) SCJ 422 = AIR 2006 SC 2088. (Para 31)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.