SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, V.K.ASHTANA
Ramesh Enterprises Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.N. Swamy,S. Sankara Vadivelu

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran :

This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 74/93 dated 26.5.93 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Bangalore holding that the appellants are not entitled to the benefit of Notfn. No. 390/86 in respect of imported item namely Coffee grinder. The Serial No. 8 of the Notfn. provided exemption to "Coffee roaster and grinder for Coffee curing machinery". The Commissioner in the appeal has held that as the exemption applies specifically to coffee roaster and grinder, it implies that the concession is applicable to a unit which performs both these functions, whereas the subject goods imported is only Coffee Roaster.

2. We have heard both sides in the matter. After a detailed consideration, we are of the considered opinion that the reasoning adopted by the Learned Commissioner in the Order is not sustainable. The reason being that the Coffee Grinder imported by the appellants is undoubtedly for Coffee Curing Machinery. We notice from the Commissioner (Appeals) order that he has observed that the item in question has a weight of 15 Kg Net and 20 Kg Gross as seen form the Literature. He is of the opinion that the machinery is a domestic appliance and it cannot be consider

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top