SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 152

K.C.BHANU
Gone Rajamma – Appellant
Versus
Chennamaneni Mohan Rao – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
For the Petitioner:K.V. Bhanu Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Satyam Reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed against the order, dated 19-10-2009, in C.M.A.No.57 of 2007, on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, in confirming the order, dated 26-09-2007, in I.A.No.337 of 2007 in O.S.No.79 of 2007, on the file of the Senior Civil

Judge, Peddapalli.

2. Petitioners herein are the respondents (defendants) and the respondent herein is the petitioner (plaintiff) in the suit.

3. Brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the present revision may be stated as follows:

The respondent herein filed I.A.No.337 of 2007 in O.S.No.79 of 2007 before the trial Court under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC to grant temporary injunction restraining the petitioners herein, their agents, workmen, servants and labourers from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the respondent herein over the suit schedule land bearing Sy.No.194, measuring Ac.6.39 guntas situated at Sankenapalli village of Velgatoor mandal stating that he is the owner and possessor and in occupation of the suit land having purchased the same from one Gone Kistaiah for a sale consideration of Rs.50,000/- on 08-05-1988 and that h
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top