ORDER (Per A. Gopal Reddy, J.)

In these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners obtained a Rule from this Court calling upon the respondents to show cause why a writ in the nature of Certiorari should not be issued after calling the records relating to the order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-1st respondent dated 05-12-2008 made in C.D.No.32 of 2006 and to quash the same.

2. A short resume of facts necessary for disposal of the writ petitions is as under:

3. The writ petitioners and respondents 4 and 5 in W.P.No.712 of 2009 (hereinafter 3 called "landowners") have entered into a Development Agreement with Mis. Kamala Builders-3rd respondent, who is the petitioner in W.P.No.3013 of 2009 on 05-07-1997 (hereinafter called "developer") to develop the house property bearing No.1-4/l (New) (Old No.1-33/l) admeasuring 790 square yards or 663.30 square metres in Sy.No.166 situated at Hyder Nagar Village, Balanagar Mandal, Kukatpally Municipality, Rangareddy District.

4. Under the Development Agreement, the developer has to undertake the construction of the proposed residential commercial complex in the schedule property after obtaining n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document