SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 373

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
U. Madan Gopal – Appellant
Versus
M. Sudhakar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Rajasekhar, Advocate. For the Respondent: ---

JUDGMENT :

1. This revision is directed against the order dated 31.12.2009 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar District in I.A.No.1011 of 2009 in O.S.No.70 of 2007 whereby the petition filed under Section 151 CPC to adjudicate the admissibility of an agreement of sale dated 23.09.2002 was dismissed.

2. Facts in brief are that revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit before the court below. The suit is coming up for trial and the plaintiff who is the Respondent herein filed his Chief examination affidavit wherein certain documents are coming up for marking as Exs.A.1 to A.6. At that stage the revision Petitioner who is the defendant filed the above application stating that the suit document is not to be admitted in evidence because of its non registration as per law as the said document prescribes that the entire amount has been received and possession was also delivered and since it is still an unregistered document though stamp duty and penalty as required under Article 47 of the Act is paid on it. Hence the said Ex.A.1 is not to be admitted either in the capacity of sale deed or in the capacity of sale agreement in the suit even for collater










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top