1. On 23-1-1998, this Court made the following order:

“In view of the substantial questions of law raised under Clauses (a) to (g) of Ground No.30 of Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal, admit the Second Appeal.

In C.M.P.No.21707/1997, on 23-1-1998, this Court made the following order:

“Interim stay as prayed for until further orders. Notice”.

2. The substantial questions of law, on the strength of which the Second Appeal had been admitted as aforesaid, are as hereunder:

(a) Whether the plaintiff who has come to Court with unclean hands can ask for the discretionary relief of specific performance?

(b) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of a contract which does not disclose the details of the property sought to be sold and purchased?

(c) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance of a contract whose terms are not certain?

(d) Whether the plaintiff who has fraudulently obtained Urban Land Ceiling permission from the competent authority by forging the defendant’s signature to the application seeking permission, can be granted specific performance of the contract?

(e) Whether the courts below were justified in decreeing the suit for specific