SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 858

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Shaik Shamiunnisa – Appellant
Versus
Narravula Obulamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:P. Gopal Das, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, Advocate.

Judgment

The appellant filed O.S.No.41 of 2006 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, against the respondents, for the relief of declaration that the suit schedule property is a public rasta in Bosenagar, Rayachoty; for mandatory injunction, for removal of existing structures and for a consequential relief of injunction to restrain respondent No.1 and her son- respondent No.2 from interfering with the use of the same. She pleaded that the lane, shown as ABCDEF in the plaint plan, is a public road and still respondents 1 and 2 are claiming it to be their exclusive passage and preventing the appellant and other men in the locality from using it. It was alleged that the original owner of the land, by name Narravula Chendrayudu Naidu, carved out plots, by leaving roads for ingress and egress, and the residents of the locality have purchased such plots and have constructed houses. According to her, the suit lane is an access for the residents of the locality to the bus stand and there was no basis for the respondents in preventing the use thereof. She pleaded that though she alone figured as plaintiff, the suit is filed for and on behalf of the residents of Bosenagar, Rayachoty.





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top