SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 1243

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Shaik Ali – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Chittoor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. T.Nagarjuna Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioners.
A.G.P. for Revenue for the Respondents.

ORDER

Despite granting of time, respondents have neither filed counter affidavit nor reported instructions.

2. The petitioners filed the present Writ Petition feeling aggrieved by the action of respondent No.4 in not receiving the documents sought to be presented by them for registration in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2-40 cents, comprised in Sy.No.15/1 of Bodumalluvaripalle Revenue village, Piler Mandal, Chittoor District.

3. The petitioners have traced their title to registered sale deed dated 11-2-1947 under which their grandfather Khasim Saheb purchased the property. It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that the name of their grandfather was mutated in the revenue records, that after his death his son, Shaik Modin Saheb succeeded to the properties and pattadar passbooks were also issued in favour of the said Shaik Modin Saheb. The petitioners are claiming through the said Modin Saheb as his lineal descendents. When the petitioners have approached respondent No.4 for issuing a certificate of market value, he declined to issue the same stating that the land is classified as Assessed Waste DRY (D.K.T.) as per M.R.O's. List. In support of the above pleas raised by the petition





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top