RAMESH RANGANATHAN, V.V.S.RAO
Subhendu Sen – Appellant
Versus
Pradeep Kumar – Respondent
V.V.S. Rao, J.
The petitioner served in the Army Medical Corp from 1969 to 1993. While he was the Lieutenant Colonel, he was court marshalled for four charges. He was exonerated on first charge. He was however, found guilty of three charges, which included misappropriation and absence without leave. The General Court Martial awarded the punishment to be cashiered and to forfeit four years of his past service for the purpose of loss of pension. The confirming authority remitted the matter for re-consideration of first charge. In obedience thereto, the General Court Martial re-assembled and confirmed their earlier finding on the first charge but, in their proceedings dated 07.05.1994, imposed the punishment of forfeiture of arrears of pay and allowances and other public money due to him at the time of cashiering. The petitioner’s appeal under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950 failed. He assailed the same in W.P.No.27714 of 1996. The same was allowed setting aside the order of the General Court Martial.
During its pendency, the petitioner was issued a show cause notice as to why his pensionary benefits should not be withheld. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 20.
Palla v Sheth v. Custodian: (2001) 7 SCC 549 = AIR 2001 SC 2763. (Para 3)
S.S. Rathore v. State of Madhya Pradesh: AIR 1990 SC 10. (Para 6)
J.S. Parihar v. Ganpat Duggar: 1997 (4) ALT 10 (D.N.) = (1996) 6 SCC 291 = AIR 1997 SC 113. (Para 8)
Anil Ratan Sarkar v. Hirak Ghosh:. (2002) 4 SCC 21 = AIR 2002 SC 1405. (Para 8)
Chhotu Ram v. State of Haryana: (2000) 10 SCC 399. (Para 10)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.