V.V.S.RAO, SANJAY KUMAR
City Tex Private Limited, A2, Bharati Apartments, P&T Colony, Vijayawada, Krishna District, represented by its Managing Director M. Surendra Babu – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer, Auto Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District – Respondent
V.V.S. Rao, J.
The petitioner company is engaged in the business of manufacture of cotton terry toweling fabrics. It is registered on the rolls of the first respondent under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (the VAT Act). For the year 2006-2007, the petitioner filed returns in VAT Form 200 disclosing purchases, sales and input tax credit availed and output tax payable. The petitioner claims that he is entitled for tax refund of Rs.4,09,427/-. The returns under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act) were also filed in CST VI Forms for 2006-07 disclosing export sales of terry towels, taxable at zero rate. They claimed exemption of interstate sales as falling under Entry 45 of I Schedule to the VAT Act.
2. In pursuance of authorization issued by the second respondent, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (DCTO), Benz Circle, Vijayawada, conducted audit of the accounts of the petitioner on 20.01.2009 for the periods from 01.04.2006 to 30.11.2008. By order dated 27.02.2009, the DCTO disallowed the input tax credit on the goods for which exemption was claimed and by applying formula AXB/C as per Rule 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 (the VAT Rules)
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar: AIR 1955 SC 661. (Para 18)
K.Prabhakaran v. P. Jayarajan: (2005) 1 SCC 754. (Para 18)
CIT v. Shakuntala: AIR 1966 SC 719. (Para 18)
Mancheri Puthusseri Ahmed v. Kuthiravattam Estate Receiver: (1996) 6 SCC 185. (Para 18)
State of Maharashtra v. Laljit Rajshi Shah: (2000) 2 SCC 699. (Para 18)
Mancheri Puthusseri Ahmed; State of W.B. v. Sadan K. Bormal: (2004) 6 SCC 59. (Para 18)
Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain: AIR 1997 SC 1006 = (1997) 1 SCC 373. (Para 20)
M/s. Oxford University Press v. Commissioner of Income Tax: AIR 2001 SC 886. (Para 20)
Administrator, Municipal Corporation
Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain: (1997) 1 SCC 373 (Same as F.No.9). (Para 20)
King Emperor v. Benoari Lal Sarma: AIR 1945 PC 48. (Para 20)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.