High Court of Andhra Pradesh
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
K. Devaiah & Others
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Education, Secretariat & Others
Writ Petition Nos.6833, 6892, 7140, 7150, 7885, 7888, 7936, 7982, 8013, 8015, 8034, 8043, 8046, 8092, 8095, 8146, 10360, 10494, 10592, 11921 & 12271 of 2012 & WPMP.Nos.11672 & 11673 of 2012
Decided On : 09-05-2012
National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 – Right To Education Act, 2009 - Article 15,29(2) -Eligibility of candidates – Imposition of restrictions – Principal, Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) and Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) was restricted to such of the candidates, who have studied in English medium it was stipulated that the candidates must have studied in English medium at any three levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation and for the posts of the PGT as well as TGT, one must have studied in English medium at any two levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation. All the petitioners claim that they are otherwise qualified as per the eligibility stipulated and only on account of the restriction aforesaid, they are excluded from consideration for direct recruitment notified under the impugned notification the Government of India felt the need to provide high quality schools for talented rural children, who may not be in a position to get access to quality schools in the urban areas. With that in view, the Government of India decided to invest in setting up good quality schools across the country and the Government introduced the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) and to begin with 6,000 new high quality schools, one in every block of the country, with set standards of excellence are proposed to be established –Held -Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that all language teachers must be treated uniformly, undoubtedly, is attractive in the first blush. It is, however, to be appreciated that the recruitment is being made for the schools where all subjects will be taught in English medium except the languages. The teachers to be recruited for all other subjects are required to satisfy the eligibility for teaching in English medium as per the notification. In that scenario, the teaching of English languages more importance and it would be wholly inconsistent with the object, if non-English medium teachers are to be recruited on the basis of their graduate or post graduate qualification in English literature eligibility qualifications is within the realm of the recruiting agency and as a policy decision, the said decision taken by the executive committee is not open for judicial review also appears well supported by a decision of the Supreme Court in BASIC EDUCATION BOARD wherein it was held that that the circular prescribing qualifications is a policy decision of the Government and unless it is shown to be in violation of some statutory or constitutional provision, the Courts would not interfere with the policy decision In the result, the writ petitions are dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs –Petition is Dismissed.
This batch of writ petitions challenges the clause 12(3)(iii) of the recruitment notification dated 06.02.2012 issued by the Commissioner and Director of School Education in his capacity as Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shikhsha Abhiyan (RMSA).
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that by virtue of the impugned clause recruitment for the posts of Principal, Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) and Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) was restricted to such of the candidates, who have studied in English medium. or the post of Principal it was stipulated that the candidates must have studied in English medium at any three levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation and for the posts of the PGT as well as TGT, one must have studied in English medium at any two levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation. All the petitioners claim that they are otherwise qualified as per the eligibility stipulated and only on account of the restriction aforesaid, they are excluded from consideration for direct recruitment notified under the impugned notification. Thus, the petitioners in this batch of cases though are having different qualifications and are seeking consideration of their respective case for different posts, admittedly, none of them are qualified with reference to the impugned requirement of having studied in English medium, as stated above. To that extent, therefore, the notification is questioned in the respective writ petitions.
Background facts:
(a) Under the 10th Five Year Plan of the Government of India, the secondary education, vocationalization of higher secondary education and open and distance learning was planned for enhancement of access to and improvement of the quality of children education. The National Policy on Education, 1986, as modified in 1992, provided ‘Access to Secondary Education will be widened with emphasis on enrolment of girls, SC’s and ST’s, particularly, in science, commerce and vocational streams…’. A committee of Central Advisory Board of Education was constituted on Universalisation of Secondary Education and on its recommendation, the Central Government established Kendriya Vidyalayas. In the 11th Five Year Plan, the Union of India desired and aimed at establishing Secondary Education School within 5 KMs and a Higher Secondary School within 7-8 KM of every habitation. Towards achieving the general object of universalization of secondary education, the Government of India felt the need to provide high quality schools for talented rural children, who may not be in a position to get access to quality schools in the urban areas. With that in view, the Government of India decided to invest in setting up good quality schools across the country and the Government introduced the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) and to begin with 6,000 new high quality schools, one in every block of the country, with set standards of excellence are proposed to be established. This concept of model schools was primarily based upon the concept of Kendriya Vidyalayas in almost all respects and majority of these schools were proposed to be set up in educationally backward blocks. The respective State Governments were to participate in setting up the schools through a society created for this purpose and the State had to provide necessary infrastructure. The funding pattern was envisaged between the Central Government and the State Government at 75% and 25% respectively with gradual increase or decrease in the said sharing pattern.
(b) Out of the sanctioned model schools, 355 model schools are to be established in the State of Andhra Pradesh and for that purpose the Government of India sanctioned an amount of Rs.412.09 crores, which includes management, monetary evaluation and research component, as grant-in-aid. The Government of the Andhra Pradesh through the School Education Department registered a Society in the name of ‘Andhra Pradesh Secondary Education Socie
V.N. SUNANDA REDDY v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (AIR 1995 SC 914)
DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE v. M. VENUGOPAL (2003 (5) ALD 512)
THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR v. SHRI TRILOKI NATH KHOSA (1974) 1 SCC 19)
AASHIRWAD FILMS v. UNION OF INDIA (2007) 6 SCC 624).
HINDI HITRAKSHAK SAMITI v. UNION OF INDIA (AIR 1990 SC 851)
STATE OF MYSORE v. P. NARASING RAO (AIR 1968 SC 349)
VISVESWARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY v. KRISHNENDU HALDER (2011) 4 SCC 606)
STATE OF U.P. v. BHUPENDRA NATH TRIPATHI (2010) 13 SCC 203)
STATE OF BIHAR v. BIHAR STATE +2 LECTURERS ASSOCIATIONS (2008) 7 SCC 231)
State of A.P. and Ors. v. Lavu Narendranath and Ors. : (1971) 3 SCR 699
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Anr. v. State of M.P. : (1999) 7 SCC 120
State of T.N. and Anr. v. S.V. Bratheep (Minor) and Ors. : (2004) 4 SCC 513.
RAM KRISHNA DALMIA V. SHRI JUSTICE S.R. TENDOLKAR (AIR 1958 SC 538)
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.