V.V.S.RAO, G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
Rythu Seva Sangam, Yenamadurru, rep. by its President, Mr. Tirumala Venkata Ratnam – Appellant
Versus
Bhimavaram Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner – Respondent
V.V.S. RAO, J.
INTRODUCTION
The residents living in villages, a short distance away to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) filed these writ petitions complaining the negligent, illegal and unplanned method and manner of the disposal of Municipal Solid Wastes (MSWs) generated in municipal areas, be they corporations or municipalities. Their Plea is that the action taken or action proposed to be taken with the concurrence of the Andhra Pradesh Pol1ution Control Board (the Board, for brevity) contravenes the relevant statutes and the Rules made thereunder. The problem presented, in this batch of cases, appears to be in existence in village panchayats, municipal areas and metropolitan areas which are all subject to more or less the same law. Besides praying for enforcement of their fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India to a healthy environment, they seek a mandamus to the ULBs to discharge their duties in accordance with the law.
2. The delicate balance between two competing rights; right of individual to life with clean environment has to be given effect keeping in view the community interest which seeks to substantially curtail the individual right especially in th
Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal: (1987) 2 SCC 295. (Para 2)
Sumit vs Payyannur Municipality: 2004 (1) KLT 438. (Para 17)
Fertilizer & Chemicals Travancore Ltd v. Employees Association: (2004) 4 SCC 420. (Para 17)
Al Mitra H. Patel v. Union of India: (1998) 2 SCC 416 = AIR 1998 SC 993. (Para 30)
Dr. B.L. Wadhera v. Union of India: (1996) 2 SCC 594. (Para 31)
Sumit v. Payyannur Municipality: 2004 (1) KLT 438. (Para 34)
Lazarus Estate v. Berly: (1956) All.E.R. 341. (Para 46)
Shrisht Dhawan v. Shaw Brothers: (1992) 1 SCC 534 = AIR 1992 SC 1555. (Para 46)
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath: (1994) 1 1 SCC = AIR 1994 SC 853. (Para 46)
Public v. State of West Bengal: AIR 1993 Cal. 215. (Para 51)
Goa Foundation v. Diksha Holdings (P) Ltd : (2001) 2 SCC 97. (Para 52)
Live Oak Resort (P) Ltd v. Panchgani Hill Station Municipal Council: (2001) 8 SCC 329. (Para 52)
Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India: (1996) 5 SCC 281. (Para 52)
Dr. Ajay Singh Rawat v. Union of India: (1995) 3 SCC 266. (Para 53)
Hinch Lal Tiwari v Kamala Devi: (2001) 6 SCC 496 = AIR 2001 SC 3215. (Para 56)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.