In this civil revision petition assailed order dated 14.9.2012 passed in IA No. 763 of 2012 in as No. 771 of 2008 on the file of the Court of III Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar. The petitioners are the defendants 8 and 9 and the respondents are the plaintiff and remaining defendants in the suit.

2. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession of the plaint schedule properties. The defendants 8 and 9 filed the I.A. under Order XIV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to frame the following additional issues.

1. Whether the plaintiff is effectively ousted from the suit schedule properties against the interest of D1 to D4 and D6?

2. Whether the suit is barred by limitation?

3. The plea of the defendants 8 and 9 is that they purchased the• properties of the joint family of their vendors. In fact the plaintiff was ousted from the suit schedule properties thereby the defendants 1 to 4 and 6 alone became entitled to the properties. The claim of the plaintiff is that after the death of their father she became entitled to share in the properties as coparcener. According to her, the defendants 8 and 9, the subsequent purchasers, cannot t