L.NARASIMHA REDDY, P.NAVEEN RAO
Sanjay Kumar Patengay – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayana Rao Patangay – Respondent
P. Naveen Rao, J.
1. The unsuccessful Plaintiffs are the appellants herein. Original Suit No.1006 of 1994 is filed by the plaintiffs for partition of suit schedule property into four equal shares, allotment of their respective shares as between the plaintiffs and defendant No.1 and for delivery of possession of the respective share. Plaintiff Nos.1 and 3 are the sons and plaintiff No.2 is the daughter of defendant No.1; defendant No.2 is the fostered daughter of late Ramji Patangay and Smt. Laxmi Bai Patangay. Defendant No.3 is the husband of defendant No.2 and defendant Nos.4 and 5 are children of defendant Nos.2 and 3.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.
3. The case of the plaintiffs is that their grandfather late Ramji Patangay was the absolute owner and possessor of suit schedule property, which is a double storied house, bearing Municipal Nos.4-4-264, 4-4-265 and 4-4-266, admeasuring 2500 Sq. yards situated at Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. Late Ramji Patangay died in the year 1956. During his life time, he married Smt. Laxmi Bai Patangay, who died in the year 1984 issueless. Late Ramji Patangay also married Smt. Rajam
Balbir Singh Wasu v. Lakhbir Singh and others
Bhagwat Ram and others v. Ramji Ram and others
Bishundeo Narain and another v. Seogeni Rai and others
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh and others
Inkollu Sasikala and another v. Inkollu Venkata Murthy and others
Lachman Singh v. Kirpa Singh and others
M/s. Gajanan Stores, rep. &y its Managing Partner v. Smt. Shailaja Khadilkar
Shankar Sitaram Sontakke and another v. Balkrishna Sitaram Sontakke and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.