M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Yarlagunta Bhaskar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bommaji Danam – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed challenging the order dt.03-9-2012 in I.A.No.150 of 2011 in I.A.No.119 of 2010 in OS.No.31 of 2010 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally, Khammam District.
2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner at the stage of admission.
3. The petitioners are defendants in the said suit. The suit was filed by the respondents restraining the petitioners-defendants from interfering with their alleged possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and costs. The court below in I.A.No.119 of 2010 granted ad-interim injunction order in favour of the respondents on 09-4-2010.
4. The respondents filed I.A.No.150/2011 against petitioners seeking police aid alleging that petitioner Nos.1 and 3 were set ex-parte in the suit; that they had not filed written statement; and petitioners 2 and 4 are contesting the suit; that inspite of the ad-interim injunction order dt.09-4-2010, the petitioners and their family members were interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the respondents-plaintiffs in respect of the plaint schedule property; that on 20-5-2011 and 09-6-201
Meera Chauhan v. Harsh Bishnoi
N. Karpagam and others v. P. Deivanaiammal and others
P.R. Muralidharan and others v. Swamy Dharmananda Theertha Padar and others
Polavarapu Nagamani and others v. Parchuri Koteshwara Rao and others
Satyanarayana Tiwari v. SHO, PS, Santoshnagar
Smt. Nirabai J. Patil v. Narayan D. Patil AIR 2004 Bom. 225 [Para 18]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.