SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 801

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Yarlagunta Bhaskar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bommaji Danam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed challenging the order dt.03-9-2012 in I.A.No.150 of 2011 in I.A.No.119 of 2010 in OS.No.31 of 2010 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally, Khammam District.

2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner at the stage of admission.

3. The petitioners are defendants in the said suit. The suit was filed by the respondents restraining the petitioners-defendants from interfering with their alleged possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and costs. The court below in I.A.No.119 of 2010 granted ad-interim injunction order in favour of the respondents on 09-4-2010.

4. The respondents filed I.A.No.150/2011 against petitioners seeking police aid alleging that petitioner Nos.1 and 3 were set ex-parte in the suit; that they had not filed written statement; and petitioners 2 and 4 are contesting the suit; that inspite of the ad-interim injunction order dt.09-4-2010, the petitioners and their family members were interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the respondents-plaintiffs in respect of the plaint schedule property; that on 20-5-2011 and 09-6-201









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top