R.KANTHA RAO
Nakka Parthasarathy – Appellant
Versus
Nakka Krishnaveni – Respondent
This appeal arises out of the decree and judgment dated 31.12.1998 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam in OS Na.79 of 1995.
2. The plaintiff filed the suit far declaration of her title to the plaint "A, B, C and D" site, far recovery of possession of the said property by evicting the defendants therefrom. The learned trial Court decreed the suit with casts, feeling aggrieved the first defendant filed the instant appeal.
3. I have heard Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing far the appellant and Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Counsel appearing far the respondents.
4. For the convenience sake, I would like to refer the parties as 'the plaintiff and the defendants'.
5. The plaintiffs case as set out in the plaint is like this:
The plaintiff is the wife of late Narayana Rao and defendants 1 and 2 are her sans. The plaint schedule property is the self-acquired property of late Narayana Rao, who became sick while in service and he executed a registered settlement deed in respect of the plaint schedule property an 17.9.1979 in favaur of his sans, defendants 1 and 2 thinking that the defendants would look-after him properly in his aid-age. Subseque
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.