SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 722

GHULAM MOHAMMED
Gampa Sai Ravi Kiran – Appellant
Versus
Bonda Rama Lakshmi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G. Venkata Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:G.V.S. Ramaiah Naidu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.

1. This revision is filed against the order and decree, dated 10-02-2010, passed in I.A.No.25 of 2010 in I.A.No.915 of 2009 in O.S.No.1561 of 2009 on the file of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. Brief facts are that the petitioner herein filed O.S.No.1561 of 2009 for permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein and their men from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and for such other reliefs. Along with the said suit, he filed I.A.No.915 of 2009 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC seeking ad-interim injunction against the respondents 1 to 4 and the Court below directed both parties to maintain status quo. Later, petitioner filed the present I.A.No.25 of 2010 under Order XIX Rule 2 r/w Rule 52 CPC seeking to summon respondents 1 to 4 for the purpose of cross-examination in I.A.No.915 of 2009. Respondents filed a counter-affidavit denying all the averments of the affidavit, stating that there is no necessity to cross-examine them as it is not permissible under law. However, the Court below dismissed the said application. Aggrieved thereby, the present revisio










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top