C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Peddi Sailaja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings in Rc.No.2026/11-D4, dated 15.1.2013, of respondent No.2, whereby he has confirmed the order, dated 31.3.2010, of respondent No.3.
2. In the manner in which this Court is proposing to dispose of the writ petition, it is not necessary to record the facts in detail. It will suffice to note that in the family partition, Ac.0.88 cents of land fell to the share of the husband of petitioner No.1. According to the petitioners, the husband of petitioner No.1 by name, Venkateswar Rao, was holding pattadar pass books and title deeds. The said Venkateswar Rao died in the year 2002. On the petitioners approaching respondent No.4, he has issued pattadar pass books and title deeds in favour of petitioner No.1. Years later, respondent No.5 approached respondent No.4 by claiming that the property belongs to him and that therefore issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds to petitioner No.1 was illegal.
3. Respondent No.4 has submitted a report on 22.1.2010 to respondent No.3, who thereupon has initiated suo motu proceedings by treating the said report as an appeal. After giving notice to both the parties, respondent No.3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.