This review petition has been filed by the petitioner to review the order dated 21.06.2013 passed in W.P.No.26924 of 1999 by this Court.

The petitioner herein was appointed in the respondent bank on 23.04.1970. He was removed from service on 23.11.1996 and the same was confirmed by the order of the second respondent on 27.12.1997. In the removal order dated 16.11.1996, in Para 4, it is mentioned as follows:-

“As regards the period spent by you under suspension, I have examined the manner and consider that there is no case to treat it as on duty and accordingly, you will not be entitled for payment of any amount except the amount already paid to you by way of subsistence allowance.”

When it was brought to the notice of this court that the petitioner has already put in 26 years of service and he had already attained the age of retirement and an officer who is removed from service is also entitled for pension and other retiremental benefits as per the existing rules if such employee had already put in 26 years of service. Having regard to such submissions, this Court passed the order under review and the operative of the said order reads as follows:-

“In the above circumst