The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not ratifying the appointment of the petitioner in the existing aided vacancy by extending the benefit of relaxation given to similarly situated persons, though the petitioner has been working in the existing vacancy from 25.06.2001, apart from seeking certain consequential relief.

It being the second round of litigation, the facts in brief are that the petitioner possessed all the necessary qualifications to be appointed Grade-II Hindi Pandit. On 25.06.2001, the 5th respondent school appointed the petitioner in the vacancy, which arose owing to the promotion of the incumbent Hindi Pandit in the same school. Having joined the service, the petitioner made numerous representations to the authorities to ratify her appointment and to absorb her in the aided vacancy. Despite the recommendation of the School Management, when the authorities had not considered the ratification of her appointment, the petitioner was constrained to file W.P.No.21688 of 2004, which was disposed of on 26.11.2004 by this Court with a direction to the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders on the proposals of t