ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
IVRCL Assets & Holdings Limited – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission – Respondent
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
I.V.R.C.L. Assets & Holdings Limited filed this Writ Petition questioning the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent-A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, for issue of a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order impugned, passed in I.A.No. 1687 of 2013 in C.C.No. 95 of 2012 dated 06-08-2013 as illegal, improper, unjust and set aside the same as it is beyond the scope of Section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, 'the Act of 1986') and contrary to the law laid down by Apex Court in S.M.S. Tea Estates Vs. Messrs Chandmari Tea Estates Private Limited (2011) 14 SCC 66) and to direct the 1st respondent not to look into the contents of unregistered GPA-cum-JDA dated 24-03-2007 alleging that the order passed by the 1st respondent is against the law laid down by the Apex Court.
2. The 2nd respondent is the owner of plot No. 33, part of plot Nos. 29(p), 34(p) and 30(p), admeasuring 100 square yards in survey No. 77, Cyber Enclave, Madhapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District, and the 2nd respondent is a member of Cyber Enclave Welfare Association. The 2nd respondent, along with neighbouring plot owners of
S.M.S. Tea Estates Vs. Messrs Chandmari Tea Estates Private Limited (2011) 14 SCC 66)
Barium Chemicals Limited Vs. Vishwa Bharati Mining Corporation (2009) 16 SCC 262)
Ram Rattan (dead) by legal representatives Vs. Bajran lal and others (AIR 1978 SC 1393)
Cicily Kallarackal Vs. Vehicle Factory (2012 (8) SCC 524)
Om Prakash Saini Vs. DCM Limited & Others (AIR 2010 SC 2608)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.