P.NAVEEN RAO
Jagga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
In these writ petitions, petitioners challenge the orders revising the stamp duty and demanding registration fee on the lease agreements entered into by the petitioners with the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology-4th respondent in WP Nos.25723, 25826 and 30914 of 2008 and 2nd respondent in WP No.23710 of 2008.
2. For the sake of convenience, the facts in Writ Petition No.25723 of 2008 are considered. The Convener of Mahaboobnagar District Level Sand Committee published Notification No.3594/SAND/06, dated 11.6.2007 inviting the sealed tenders/public auction for leasing out the right of quarrying for the sand at various places in the district as notified (Ex.P2 at Page No.13 of the paper book). Petitioner participated for Ankilla and Veeranagar Villages of Koihisagar Project, Koilkonda Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District (Item 8 of the notification). Auctions were conducted on 28.6.2007. Petitioner stood as highest bidder. By proceedings dated 5.7.2007, District Collector confirmed the auction in favour of petitioner; petitioner was asked to deposit Rs.5,65,200/- towards stamps and an additional amount towards security deposit. Consequent to depositing of the above amounts, an
Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam, Triupra and Manipur v. The Panbari Tea Company Limited
P. Dilli Babu Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
P. Venkata Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
Pradeep Oil Corporation v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and another
Shri Shri Tarakeshwar Sio Thakur Jiu v. Bar Dass Dey and Company and others
Uppalapati Durga Prasad v. Executive Engineer (R and B) N.H. Division, Srikakulam and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.