ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Manju Devi – Respondent
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
1. These two appeals are filed by the second respondent-Insurance Company and the petitioners-claimants, separately, aggrieved by the impugned award dated 04.02.2011, passed in O.P. No.1327 of 2009, on the file of XXII Additional Chief Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, City Criminal Court, Hyderabad (For short, the Tribunal), whereunder the Original Petition filed by the petitioners-claimants was allowed, in part, awarding compensation of Rs.23,79,188/- against the original claim of Rs.30,00,000/-.
2. The appellant in M.A.C.M.A. No.2332 of 2011 was the second respondent-Insurance Company and appellants in M.A.C.M.A. No.1898 of 2012 were the petitioners-claimants before the Tribunal in O.P. No.1327 of 2009. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred as arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The petitioners-claimants filed Claim Petition before the Tribunal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (For short, Act of 1988) claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-for untimely death of Yogender Kumar Rai (hereinafter referred to as Yogender), who is the husband of first petitioner, father of petitioners 2 to 4 re
National Insurance Company Limited v. Renu Bala (2005) II ACC 495 (DB) (P&H)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.