1. This petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.225 of 2011 on the file of Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Mangalagiri.

2. Sri Ch.Masthan Naidu, the leaned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the criminal proceedings against the petitioners are liable to be quashed for the following reasons:

i. The allegations made in the charge sheet do not satisfy the basic ingredients of Section 107 and 306 IPC,

ii. The petitioners were falsely implicated in this case by the de-facto complainant with a malafide intention, and

iii. There is no nexus between the alleged incident of uttering the words by the petitioners and suicide committed by the deceased.

3. Per contra, Sri M. Chalapathi Rao, the learned counsel for the second respondent would submit that as the allegations made in the charge sheet constitute the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners, this is not a fit case to quash the proceedings against the petitioners by invoking the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

4. Before adverting to the factual aspects of the case, I feel it apt to refer to the case law cited by both the counsel. The lea