SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1243

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
S. Krishnaiah – Appellant
Versus
Guru Raghavendra Traders – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy
For Respondents/Defendant: Public Prosecutor

ORDER

Dr. B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner-accused, having been aggrieved by the order dated 11.06.2014 in Crl.M.P. No. 1202 of 2014 in C.C. No. 62 of 2014 on the file of the II Special Magistrate at Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy district (private complaint case filed for dishonour of cheque).

2. The petitioner-accused when filed Crl.M.P. No. 1202 of 2014 under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, with a prayer to permit him to cross-examine the P.W. 1 by confronting with the video CD with the aid of CD. player to contradict with his previous statement and the same was ended in dismissal after hearing both sides vide order dated 11.06.2014 holding that admittedly, there is no previous statement of the respondent/complainant in writing on record and no material placed by the petitioner/accused certifying the authenticity of the video CD filed by the petitioner/accused. Now impugning the same filed this revision with the contentions that the order of the learned judge is erroneous and without appreciation of the facts and law in relation thereto, hence liable to be set aside.

3. The 1st respondent/complai










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top