SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 199

R.SUBHASH REDDY, B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Ahmed Mohiuddin – Appellant
Versus
Shabana Yasmeen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: Party-in-person.
For the Respondent:M/s. M.A.K. Mukheed, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Dr. B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. The appellant Ahmed Mohiuddin is the husband of Shabana Yasmeen who is the respondent herein as well before the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad in O.P. No.1411 of 2010. The petitioner, appellant herein, filed the said petition, under Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act against his wife, for custody of their three minor children viz., Ramsha Tahoor Ahmed, 17 years; Zubia Menaaz Ahmed, 15 years; Mohammed Afraz Ahmed, 7 years. Before the trial Court the petitioner himself was examined as P.W-1 with reference to Exs.P-1 to P-51 and one M.M. Hussain was examined as P.W-2 and the respondent herself was examined as R.W-1 with reference to Exs.R-1 to R-7. The trial Court pursuant to the pleadings and contest basing on the evidence, dismissed the petition by order dated 15.06.2013 negating the custody with observations that since all the three children are residing with the mother i.e., respondent and of whom the 1st daughter is a major, the 2nd daughter also almost reached the age crossing minority, but for the third issue son, born on 10.05.2004, for whom the petitioner has been enjoying the visiting rights as per the orders in I.A. No.372 of 2011

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top