B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Linga Ranjith Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Mishra – Respondent
B. Chandra Kumar, J.
1. When an order has been passed by this Court, it is the bounden duty of the respondents/officials to implement the orders of the Court. The respondents after receiving the orders of this Court and in the process of implementing the same cannot reopen the matter and start examining the matter afresh. There is no need to examine as to whether the petitioner's case is in accordance with Government Orders or Government Memos issued from time to time. They cannot sit over judgments upon the orders passed by this Court. It is nothing but disobeying and disrespecting the orders of this Court. Whatever grounds, the officials have to take, they must take in their counter and at least when the writ petition or the matter is heard by the Court. In fact, after giving notice to the concerned Government Pleaders, the matters will be listed. They had given an opportunity to argue the matter before the Court. Even otherwise, the remedy leftover to them is to file vacate stay petition, review petition or an appeal before the Division Bench or to approach the apex Court. Even where there is a direction to consider the case of the petitioner, the respondents have to conside
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.