SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1453

B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Linga Ranjith Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: B.H.R. Choudary
For Respondents/Defendant: Government Pleader

Order

B. Chandra Kumar, J.

1. When an order has been passed by this Court, it is the bounden duty of the respondents/officials to implement the orders of the Court. The respondents after receiving the orders of this Court and in the process of implementing the same cannot reopen the matter and start examining the matter afresh. There is no need to examine as to whether the petitioner's case is in accordance with Government Orders or Government Memos issued from time to time. They cannot sit over judgments upon the orders passed by this Court. It is nothing but disobeying and disrespecting the orders of this Court. Whatever grounds, the officials have to take, they must take in their counter and at least when the writ petition or the matter is heard by the Court. In fact, after giving notice to the concerned Government Pleaders, the matters will be listed. They had given an opportunity to argue the matter before the Court. Even otherwise, the remedy leftover to them is to file vacate stay petition, review petition or an appeal before the Division Bench or to approach the apex Court. Even where there is a direction to consider the case of the petitioner, the respondents have to conside




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top