SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 1443

A.V.SESHA SAI
Dasari Lingaiah – Appellant
Versus
Thatikonda Venugopal Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: J. Sreenivasa Rao

Order

Akula Venkata Sesha Sai, J.

1. This revision, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the defendant in OS No. 7/2011 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Kodad, assails the order dated 15.7.2014 passed by the said Court, dismissing IA No. 101 of 2014 filed by him under the provisions of Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act (for short "the Act"). Heard Sri J. Sreenivasa Rao, learned Counsel for petitioner, apart from perusing the material available before the Court. Despite service of notice on the Counsel for the respondent in the Court below, none appeared for the respondent.

2. The facts and circumstances leading to filing of the present revision are as under:

The respondent herein instituted OS No. 07 of 2011 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Kodad, against the petitioner herein, for recovery of Rs. 54,240/- together with interest on the foot of a promissory note said to have been executed by the petitioner herein.

3. In the said suit, the defendant/petitioner herein filed present Interlocutory Application No. 101 of 2014 under Section 45 of the Act, praying the Court below to send the promissory note and receipt dated 2.2.2009 (Ex. A1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top