SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 414

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
G. L. Purusotham – Appellant
Versus
Y. Nagaraju – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: O. Udaya Kumar
For the Respondents: A. Purushotham Reddy

Order

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dt. 19-08-2014 in I.A. No. 753 of 2012 in O.S. No. 104 of 2012 of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. The petitioners herein are defendants in the suit.

2. The respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit for a perpetual injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties. In the plaint, it is alleged by respondents that petitioners created certain documents in order to encroach on the southern side of the plaint schedule properties and they also attempted to close a channel by encroaching into the lands of respondents on the southern side of the plaint schedule properties.

3. Written statement was filed by 4th defendant/4th petitioner claiming that they have jointly purchased the lands adjacent to the plaint schedule properties and that the plaint schedule properties are to the north of the land of 4th petitioner and he had no necessity to interfere with the lands of respondents. They alleged that it was the respondents, who removed the survey stones and encroached into the land of petitioners and

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top