NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
P. Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Poosa Muthyalu – Respondent
This revision is preferred calling in question the legality of the order passed on 20.12.2014 in I.A.No.781 of 2014 in O.S.No.26 of 2006, by the XI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the said petition.
The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in the suit filed for partition and separate possession of the suit ‘A’ schedule land admeasuring Ac.12.08 guntas lying in Sy.No.258 of Manikonda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The suit was initially filed impleading thereto six defendants. Thereafter, Sri P. Krishna and two others got impleaded as defendants. I.A.No.505 of 2012 filed by them for impleadment was in fact dismissed on 17.02.2014. Against the order of dismissal, Sri P. Krishna and two others carried the matter by way of revision to this Court in C.R.P.No.335 of 2014 which was allowed by this Court impleading them as defendants 11 to 13, as in the meantime Smt. P. Sobha Rani and others filed I.A.No.291 of 2014 to implead them as defendants and that I.A. was allowed on 18.07.2014 impleading them as defendants 7 to 10 in the suit.
It is the case of the petitioner herein that the defendants 11 to 13 filed their written statement o
A.K. Gupta & Songs Limited v. Damodar Vally Corporation (AIR 1967 SC 96)
B.K. Narayana Pillai vs. Parameswaran Pillai and another ((2000) 1 SCC 712)
Charan Das v. Amir Khan 47 Ind App 255: AIR 1921 PC 50
L.J. Leach and Company Ltd v. Jardine Skinner and Company: 1957 SCR 438: AIR 1957 SC 357
Pirgonda Hongonda Patil v. Kalgonda Shidgonda: 1957 SCR 595 (603) : AIR 1957 SC 363
Revajeetu Builders and Developers vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors ((2009) 10 SCC 84)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.