SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(AP) 649

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
P. Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Poosa Muthyalu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ranga Rao Nellutla, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R11 to R13, D. Gnaneswara Naidu, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This revision is preferred calling in question the legality of the order passed on 20.12.2014 in I.A.No.781 of 2014 in O.S.No.26 of 2006, by the XI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the said petition.

The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in the suit filed for partition and separate possession of the suit ‘A’ schedule land admeasuring Ac.12.08 guntas lying in Sy.No.258 of Manikonda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The suit was initially filed impleading thereto six defendants. Thereafter, Sri P. Krishna and two others got impleaded as defendants. I.A.No.505 of 2012 filed by them for impleadment was in fact dismissed on 17.02.2014. Against the order of dismissal, Sri P. Krishna and two others carried the matter by way of revision to this Court in C.R.P.No.335 of 2014 which was allowed by this Court impleading them as defendants 11 to 13, as in the meantime Smt. P. Sobha Rani and others filed I.A.No.291 of 2014 to implead them as defendants and that I.A. was allowed on 18.07.2014 impleading them as defendants 7 to 10 in the suit.

It is the case of the petitioner herein that the defendants 11 to 13 filed their written statement o


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top