M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Govindula Sathaiah – Appellant
Versus
Govindula Manjula – Respondent
1. The unsuccessful petitioner/husband filed this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders dated 21.09.2011 of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Jagtial passed in IA.No.378 of 2011 in OP.No.18 of 2008 filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act requesting to refer the petitioner, the respondent/his wife and her son Shiva Kumar for DNA test at Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Habsiguda, Hyderabad for determination of parentage of the said male child Shiva Kumar by the Centre.
2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. I have perused the material record.
3. The facts, which are necessary for consideration, in brief, are as follows:
The petitioner and the respondent are man and wife. The petitioner filed the original petition before the trial Court for grant of divorce by dissolution of the marriage between the parties and in that original petition, he had taken a plea that he is not responsible for the birth of the male child-Shiva Kumar by the respondent and that he had no access to the respondent, who is the mother of the said male ch
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.