1. The 4th defendant in O.S.No.56 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad preferred this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the docket order dated 11.09.2015 over-ruling the objection raised by the learned counsel for the 4th defendant about admissibility of possessory agreement or sale, dated 26.06.2012 marked as Ex.A.1.

2. The revision petitioner is the 4th defendant, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondents 2 to 4 are defendants 1 to 3 before the trial Court.

3. The case of the petitioner is that at the time of marking possessory agreement of sale as Ex.A.1 objection could not be raised as it was marked in the affidavit filed under Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC in lieu of examination in chief and learned counsel was sick on that day and therefore, questioning the admissibility of the possessory agreement of sale, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, filed memo bringing to the notice of the Court that the document is inadmissible, in view of Explanation to S.No. 47A of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp Act and 17(1) of the Registration Act. The trial Cou