A. Ramalingeswara Rao, J.

1. Two unfortunate unmarried women filed the present Civil Revision Petition seeking to protect their ancestral property. Their attempt is strongly opposed by the auction purchaser, who is the third respondent herein. Their father, who is the second respondent is unrepresented. The decree holder first respondent remains silent.

2. The brief facts leading to the present case are that the second respondent executed a promissory note for Rs. 25,000/- in favour of the first respondent on 01.03.1998. Though he paid an amount of Rs. 4,000/- subsequently, he committed default in paying the balance amount. The first respondent filed O.S. No. 190 of 2003 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Sullurpet, for recovery of an amount of Rs. 52,500/- on 12.06.2003. It was decreed for Rs. 52,500/- with subsequent interest at 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 21,000/- on 13.10.2004. The first respondent filed E.P. No. 85 of 2005 before the learned Junior Civil Judge, Sullurpet, and the property of the second respondent was attached on 22.08.2005.