M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Yeddula Satheesk Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Sankireddy Bakkireddi Aseervad Kumar Reddy – Respondent
1. This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners/proposed defendants 6 to 8/3rd parties to the suit is directed against the orders dated 07.06.2013 of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Kadapa passed in I.A. No. 89 of 2013 in O.S. No. 33 of 2012 filed under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code, for brevity) for their impleadment as defendants 6 to 8 in the suit.
2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the revision petitioners/proposed defendants (the proposed defendants, for brevity) and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent/plaintiff (the plaintiff, for brevity).
The other respondents are defendants 1 to 5. I have perused the material record.
3. The case of the proposed defendants is this: They had purchased the item no.1 of the suit schedule property from the 3rd defendant on 31.07.2012 for a valuable consideration under a regular registered sale deed and that the 3rd defendant had delivered possession of the same to them and that they are in possession of the property. The 3rd proposed party has in fact purchased a part of the property in it
Vidhur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. And Ors.
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd.
Khemchand Shanker Choudhary v. Vishnu Hari Patil
Amit Kumar Shaw v. Farida Khatoon
Rikhu Dev, Chela Bawa Harjug Dass v. Som Dass (deceased) through his Chela Shiama Dass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.