SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 377

T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
Guttikonda Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Mittal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Mukund Reddy, S. Surender Reddy, Deepak Bhattacharjee, Advocates.

Judgment :

T. Sunil Chowdary J.

1. This civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC challenging the order dated 05.10.2015 passed in I.A.No.206 of 2015 in A.S.No.26 of 2010 on the file of court of Family Judge-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Adilabad, wherein and whereby the petition filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10(2) of CPC was dismissed.

2. To avoid confusion, the parties will hereinafter be referred as they are arrayed in the I.A.

3. The facts, which are relevant for disposal of this civil revision petition, are as follows:

The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 leased out the suit schedule property of an extent Ac.0.10 guntas in plot No.37/A near NH No.7, opposite to Rest House, Dwaraka Nagar, Adilabad town to the petitioner under lease agreement dated 10.8.1990. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 executed another lease deed in respect of the same property in favour of the petitioner on 12.3.1992 for a period of 15 years on a monthly rent of Rs.5,000/-. The petitioner has been running petrol bunk in the leased premises. While things stood thus, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed O.S. No.31 of 2005 on the file of the court of Junior Civil Judge, Adilabad for eviction of the pe


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top