V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, ANIS
R. Seethamma @ Seetha Lakshmi W/o Sri. R. Vema Reddy – Appellant
Versus
M. Thimma Reddy S/o Late M. Satyanarayana Reddy – Respondent
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of her suit for partition, the unsuccessful plaintiff has come up with this regular appeal.
2. Heard Sri. Ch. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri. K. Gopalakrishnan, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The appellant herein filed a suit in O.S. No. 71 of 2011 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, seeking partition and separate possession of her half share in the properties described in the schedule to the plaint. The case of the appellant in her plaint, inter-alia was that the respondent herein is her elder brother; that the father of the appellant and the respondent by name M. Satyanarayana Reddy died at Gudur, Kurnool District on 27.04.2006; that the suit properties are ancestral properties; that on 04.08.1954, the appellants grandfather by name M. Venkatarami Reddy and his two sons Satyanarayana Reddy and Chandrasekhar Reddy partitioned the ancestral properties; that while the properties described in Schedule-A fell to the share of the appellants grandfather, the properties described in B-schedule fell to the share of the appellants father and the properties described in C-schedu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.