SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 165

SANJAY KUMAR
P. Buchanna – Appellant
Versus
B. Yadagiri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Sreenivas, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Revision Petition under Section-115 CPC arises out of the order dated 07.11.2016 of the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, in I.A.No.1156 of 2014 in O.S.No.555 of 2013. The said suit was filed by the respondent herein for specific performance of the alleged agreement of sale dated 13.10.2012 and was decreed ex parte on 01.04.2014. The petitioner herein, the defendant in the suit, filed I.A.No.1156 of 2013 therein under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the said ex parte decree by condoning the delay of 189 days in applying for the same. By the order under revision, the Court below dismissed the said I.A.

2. Conventional means of service having failed, substituted service of notice was effected upon the respondent/plaintiff by publication thereof in Eenadu Telugu Daily newspaper, L.B.Nagar Edition. The respondent/plaintiff however did not choose to enter his appearance before this Court either in person or through counsel.

3. Perusal of the order under revision reflects that the Court below dismissed the I.A mainly on the ground that the petitioner/defendant had failed to file separate applications, one under Section 5 of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top