V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.UMA DEVI
B. S. Jag Jeevan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar (Vigilance) – Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian, J.
1. Contending that seniority in the cadre of District Judges has not been fixed in accordance with Rule 13(a) read with Schedule-A of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 2007, a promotee District Judge has come up with the present writ petition.
2. Heard Mr. G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhinand Kumar Shavili, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/High Court.
3. The petitioner was appointed as a Civil Judge (Junior Division) on 01-7-1988. He was promoted as Senior Civil Judge on 06-5-2002. He was later promoted on temporary basis as District Judge with effect from 23-9-2009. Subsequently, by an order in G.O.Ms.No.133, Law Department, dated 05-12-2012, the petitioner was promoted on regular basis under the 65% quota reserved for promotion to the post of District Judges.
4. In All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India (2002) 4 SCC 247), the Supreme Court issued various directives, one of which related to the issue of seniority. Paragraph-29 of the said decision reads as follows:
All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India
R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab
Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India
Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad Das
Malik Mazhar Sultan v. Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission
Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers’ Association v. State of Maharashtra
Bimlesh Tanwar v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.