M. Seetharama Murti, J.

These two revisions are filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful 2nd petitioner/plaintiff, assailing the orders, dated 24th February, 2016, in I.A. Nos.45 of 2016 and 46 of 2016 passed by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, filed respectively for reopening the suit and for amendment of the plaint.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for petitioners and of Sri O. Udaya Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondents.

3. I have perused the material record.

4. The facts, which are necessary to be stated as a prelude to this order, in brief, are as follows:

"The sole plaintiff brought the suit against the defendants seeking the following reliefs:

"(a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men and agents from in any manner interfering with the 2nd plaintiff's possession of the plaint 'A' schedule mentioned vacant site;

(b) declaring that the passage between points D, D1, E, E1 is exclusive passage of the 2nd plaintiff, which is more fully described in plaint 'B' schedule, and for permanent injunction restraining defendants from interferi