This revision petition is filed under Section 115 C.P.C. questioning the order dated 30.11.2015 in C.M.A.No.6 of 2013 passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 13.12.2011 in E.A.No.264 of 2010 in E.P.No.330 of 2007 in O.S.No.214 of 1992 passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, dismissing the application filed under Order 21 Rule 90 C.P.C.

2. The petitioners filed affidavit raising only one contention i.e. posting the matter for filing sale papers for test and sale of E.P. schedule property without attachment, but raised different contentions during hearing before the executing Court. In view of the various contentions raised during hearing, it is appropriate to extract the allegations made in the affidavit for better appreciation: I am the petitioner No.2 herein and the J.Dr.No.2 in the above said E.P. The respondent No.1 filed the above E.P. against me and one K.Lakshmi Devamma to sale the E.P., schedule property for realization of E.P. amount of Rs.3,30,000/-. The respondent No.1 herein brought the E.P. schedule property for sale. The D.Hr has not attached the E.P. schedule prop