SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 837

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
P. Naveen Rao, M. Satyanarayana Murthy, JJ.
Jalli Radha Krishna - Petitioner
Versus
State of A.P., rep by P.P., H.C., Hyderabad - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 550 of 2012
Decided On : 30-11-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Venkata Ramesh
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Criminal Appeal - Accused went to the house of P.Ws.1 & 2and took away offering feast, went to their fields, had toddy at their fields - After that, the accused invited deceased for dinner in his house, then the accused and deceased had dinner in the house of the accused - At that time deceased enquired about the wife of the accused repeatedly - Held, In the facts of the present case, as discussed above, accused had no intention to kill till they had dinner in the house of accused, but suddenly the accused suspected about development of illicit contact with wife of accused/appellant, as repeatedly enquired about wife of accused - As such, the act of accused is not pre-meditated and the incident of beating ensued suddenly in grave provocation - Another aspect is, causing injury with butt of M.O.2 - It is also another strong circumstance to believe that the accused had no intention to kill him - In view of our foregoing discussion, the prosecution proved that the accused/appellant caused injuries on the vital parts of the body of deceased which lead to his death, but not with an intention to kill him - Therefore, the conviction recorded by the Court below for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC is set-aside, converting the conviction of the accused/appellant - Appeal allowed. (Paras 76, 77)

ORDER :

M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.

The accused in Sessions Case No. 230 of 2011 on the file of V Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Khammam at Kothagudem, preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C, 1973 challenging the conviction and sentence passed in calendar and judgment dated 14.03.2012.

2. One Jalli Bhadraiah (P.W.1), the de facto complainant and the accused Jalli Radha Krishna are the residents of Jallivarigudem. P.W.2 Jalli Chandramma is the wife of Jalli Bhadraiah. Kalluri Muthaiah, the deceased is the sister-in-law's son of P.W.1-Jalli Bhadraiah. P.W.3-Karam Bojji is the brother of the deceased and resident of Kaiguru Village of Chintoor Mandal. P.W.4-Jalli Chinnathamaiah, P.W.5-Punam Chandraiah, L.Ws. 6 to 11 i.e. Jalli Somaiah, Jalli Pullarao, Jalli Subbamma, Jalli Nagaiah, Jalli Laxman Rao and Jalli Raju are also residents of Jallivarigudem, all are closely related to one another.

3. The facts of the case in nutshell are that, on 05.01.2011 at about 07:00 P.M, the accused went to the house of P.Ws.1 & 2 and Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) and took away Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased), offering feast, went to their fields, had toddy at their fields. After that, the accused invited Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) for dinner in his house, then the accused and Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) had dinner in the house of the accused. At that time, Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) enquired about the wife of the accused repeatedly. Further, it is alleged that Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) used to visit the house of the accused frequently in this absence. On repeated enquiry, the accused suspected that Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) might have developed illicit intimacy with his wife and decided to do away the life of Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased). Then, on the same day at about 22:00 hours, after dinner, the accused took spade which was available in the house and bet Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) on his head. Later, the accused took an axe and bet Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) on his head with butt of axe. On that, the accused under the impression that Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) died, left him in the house by hiding axe and spade in the backyard of the house. During the early hours, on 06.01.2012, wife of the accused found Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) in pool of blood and struggling for life. Thereupon, she went to the house of P.W.4 and informed about the incident and in turn, P.W.4 informed the matter to Jalli Pulla Rao-L.W.7. Immediately, Jalli Pulla Rao-L.W.7 visited the house of the accused and found Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) in unconscious state in pool of blood. Immediately, Jalli Pulla Rao-L.W.7 made a telephonic call to P.W.2. On that, P.W.2, along with P.Ws 1 & 3 went to the house of the accused found Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) in pool of blood, struggling for his life. Then, L.Ws 1 to 3 and others questioned the accused about the incident and the accused confessed that he had committed the offence, as Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) had illicit relationship with his wife. Then, Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) was shifted to Government Hospital, Chintoor and after first aid, he was shifted to Government Area Hospital, Bhadrachalam, where he succumbed to injuries on 07.01.2011 at 23:00 hours. On the report-Ex.P-1 by Jalli Bhadraiah (P.W.1), the Station House Officer, V.R. Puram registered a case in Crime No. 1 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, issued F.I.R-Ex.P-16 and investigated the matter.

4. During the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer visited the Government Area Hospital, Bhadrachalam, examined the witnesses, got photographed the dead body of Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased)-Ex.P-5 to P-8, held inquest over the body of Kalluri Muthaiah (deceased) in the presence of mediators and blood relatives-Ex.P-2 and referred the dead body for post-mortem examination Ex.P-15 is the Post Mortem Report. Later, Circle Inspector of Police, Chintoor (L.W.20) took up investigation, verified the investigat




















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

gpt-4

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top