SANJAY KUMAR, T.AMARNATH GOUD
Tammisetti Venu Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Chennaiah – Respondent
Sanjay Kumar, J.
1. Contempt Case No.1231 of 2016 was filed by Tammisetti Venu Gopal, the appellant in W.A.No.1043 of 2014, alleging willful disobedience to the judgment dated 25.07.2014 passed therein. By the said judgment, a Division Bench of this Court comprising the then Hon’ble The Chief Justice and one of us, SK,J, noted that the learned single Judge had not decided anything while disposing of W.P.No.23318 of 2003, vide order dated 11.04.2014, as he had only remanded the matter to the Tahsildar, Hanamkonda, for taking a decision afresh, and directed the said authority to also decide the question of the locus of Pindi Rama Krishna Reddy, the first respondent in the writ appeal/the writ petitioner. Leaving all points open, the Division Bench further directed the authority to decide the matter within three months from the date of communication of the judgment.
2. Historical narrative, pertinent to note, is that Tammisetti Venu Gopal had secured pattadar passbooks from the Tahsildar, Hanamkonda, in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.2.00 guntas in Sy.No.118/D of Enumamula Village. Aggrieved thereby, Pindi Rama Krishna Reddy appealed to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Waranga
Binod Bihari Singh V/S. Union of India
Dr.Subhendu Sen V/S. Pradeep Kumar
E.T.Sunup V/S. C.A.N.S.S. Employees Association
Maheshwar Peri V/S. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Maninderjit Singh Bitta V/S. Union of India
R.S.Sujatha V/S. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.