1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. The present revision case is filed questioning the orders passed in Crl.R.P.No.28 of 2015 dated 18.01.2018 on the file of the Court of learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District, reversing the orders passed in M.C.No.8 of 2012 dated 16.04.2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madakasira, Anantapur District.

3. The facts in brief are that respondent Nos.2 and 3 filed M.C.No.8 of 2012 claiming a sum of Rs.3,000/- each per month against the petitioner. It is their case that respondent No.2 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner having solemnized the marriage on 12.04.1996 at the house of Begadar Venkataramanappa according to the Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage, the 2nd respondent’s father presented gold ring of two grams, some silk sarees, gold ear studs to the 2nd respondent and also to the petitioner and spent huge amount for performing the marriage. After marriage, the 2nd respondent joined the petitioner and led a happy marital life for about ten years. Out of wedlock, they were blessed with respondent