P.NAVEEN RAO
Kalastri Haribabu – Appellant
Versus
Avunuri Raju – Respondent
Sri. P. Naveen Rao, J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner Sri A.Prabhakar Rao and learned counsel for respondents Sri J.Venkateswara Reddy.
2. Parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.
3. Plaintiffs instituted suit in O.S. No. 511 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal praying to grant permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property. The suit schedule property is agricultural land to an extent of 0-30 guntas in Survey No. 200/E, Gadepalli village, Sangem mandal, Warangal district. The schedule appended to the suit describes the boundaries of the property as under:
East : Land of Kothapalli Janakiramulu
West : Land of Nanjala Kumaraswamy
North : Land of Unkanti Ramarao
South : Main road leading from Warangal to Nekkonda
4. Plaintiffs filed I.A. No. 1461 of 2008 praying to amend the relief sought in the suit and sought for declaration that plaintiffs are owners and possessors of the suit schedule property and to grant decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interference. The said I.A. was allowed by order dated 10.9.2009. Plaintiffs filed I A No. 1878 of 2015 praying to amend the schedule to the plaint with refer
B.K. Narayana Pillai Vs. Parameswaran Pillai
Ganesh Trading Company Vs. Moji Ram
Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal Vs. National Building Material Supply
Pattan Babu Khan Vs. Thummala Seshi Reddy
Ragu Thilak D.John Vs. S. Rayappan
Ram Niranjan Kajaria Vs. Sheo Prakash Kajaria
Rameshkumar Agarwal Vs. Rajmala Exports P Ltd.
Raparthy Pandu Vs. Raparthy Vajramma
Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.